Paper
1 February 2001 Modification of the multisurface theory of plasticity with one surface: comparison with experimental data
Igor N. Izotov, Nikolay P. Kuznetsov, Boris E. Melnikov, Arkadiy G. Mityukov, Andrey Yu. Musienko, Artem S. Semenov
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 4348, Fourth International Workshop on Nondestructive Testing and Computer Simulations in Science and Engineering; (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417679
Event: Fourth International Workshop on Nondestructive Testing and Computer Simulations in Science and Engineering, 2000, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Abstract
Experimental - theoretical research of the plastic deformation of thin-walled steel and nickel tubular specimens was done. The experimental results and forecasts of the kinematical hardening model and multisurface model with one active surface were compared. A modification of the plasticity theory was gone. The modification takes into account character of a loading path. The constitutive equation gives the possibility to make predictive calculations when either loading or strain path (in whole strains) is known. The research is performed for complex periodic loading paths, containing partial and complete unloading.
© (2001) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Igor N. Izotov, Nikolay P. Kuznetsov, Boris E. Melnikov, Arkadiy G. Mityukov, Andrey Yu. Musienko, and Artem S. Semenov "Modification of the multisurface theory of plasticity with one surface: comparison with experimental data", Proc. SPIE 4348, Fourth International Workshop on Nondestructive Testing and Computer Simulations in Science and Engineering, (1 February 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417679
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 5 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Nickel

Computer simulations

Copper

Materials processing

Nondestructive evaluation

Back to Top