Comparison of biomechanical breast models: a case study

Christine Tanner; Andreas Degenhard; Julia Anne Schnabel; Andrew D. Castellano-Smith; Carmel Hayes; Luke I. Sonoda; Martin O. Leach; D. Rodney Hose; Derek L.G. Hill; David John Hawkes

doi:10.1117/12.467155

9 May 2002 Comparison of biomechanical breast models: a case study

Christine Tanner, Andreas Degenhard, Julia Anne Schnabel, Andrew D. Castellano-Smith, Carmel Hayes, Luke I. Sonoda, Martin O. Leach, D. Rodney Hose, Derek L.G. Hill, David John Hawkes

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 4684, Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing; (2002) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.467155
Event: Medical Imaging 2002, 2002, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

We present initial results from evaluating the accuracy with which biomechanical breast models based on finite element methods can predict the displacements of tissue within the breast. We investigate the influence of different tissue elasticity values, Poisson's ratios, boundary conditions, finite element solvers and mesh resolutions on one data set. MR images were acquired before and after compressing a volunteer's breast gently. These images were aligned using a 3D non-rigid registration algorithm. The boundary conditions were derived from the result of the non-rigid registration or by assuming no patient motion at the deep or medial side. Three linear and two non-linear elastic material models were tested. The accuracy of the BBMs was assessed by the Euclidean distance of twelve corresponding anatomical landmarks. Overall, none of the tested material models was obviously superior to another regarding the set of investigated values. A major average error increase was noted for partially inaccurate boundary conditions at high Poisson's ratios due to introduced volume change. Maximal errors remained, however, high for low Poisson's ratio due to the landmarks closeness to the inaccurate boundary conditions. The choice of finite element solver or mesh resolution had almost no effect on the performance outcome.

Citation Download Citation

Christine Tanner, Andreas Degenhard, Julia Anne Schnabel, Andrew D. Castellano-Smith, Carmel Hayes, Luke I. Sonoda, Martin O. Leach, D. Rodney Hose, Derek L.G. Hill, and David John Hawkes "Comparison of biomechanical breast models: a case study", Proc. SPIE 4684, Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing, (9 May 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.467155

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available