28 August 2002 Considerations of a head-up display field of view
Author Affiliations +
This study arose because of a perception that a larger horizontal field of view for a Head Up Display installed in a civil transport was automatically better. There is a lack of scientific analysis to confirm or deny this view. The study addresses three situations: -Crosswind Landings, Curved Approaches and Runway Exit Angle and each situation is assess with three HUD FoV's. It was found that the Crosswind situation was limited by the aircraft landing restrictions not HUD Field of View. The curved approaches gave a more mixed conclusion but in general the time that the glidescope was within the FoV was not significantly enhanced with a 40degree FoV HUD compared to the nominal 36degree. The runway exit angle analysis showed that alternative means must be found to show the turn-off point rather than reliance on the FoV.
© (2002) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Christopher T. Bartlett, Christopher T. Bartlett, Michael L. Busbridge, Michael L. Busbridge, Olly T. Horton, Olly T. Horton, } "Considerations of a head-up display field of view", Proc. SPIE 4712, Cockpit Displays IX: Displays for Defense Applications, (28 August 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.480961; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.480961


Safely enhanced low visibility taxi
Proceedings of SPIE (May 04 2017)
Evaluation of DVE landing display formats
Proceedings of SPIE (May 03 2012)
Gate to gate operation of a civil transport Head up...
Proceedings of SPIE (August 27 2000)
Head-worn displays for NextGen
Proceedings of SPIE (June 08 2011)

Back to Top