Paper
11 December 1984 Photo Interpreters' Impressions: The Tri-Lens Tactical Reconnaissance Camera Versus The Alternatives
Glen C. Gustafson, Ron Washhurn
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Based on the work the Photo Interpreter (PI) must do, a comparison is made between the new KS-153 Tri-Lens tactical reconnaissance camera and the traditional alternatives. The work of the PI is defined broadly enough to include such peripheral activities as mission planning, mission evaluation, and the maintaining of an aerial film library. tncluded among the alternative cameras used for comparison are the short focal length framing camera, the split vertical camera fan, and the low altitude panoramic camera.
© (1984) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Glen C. Gustafson and Ron Washhurn "Photo Interpreters' Impressions: The Tri-Lens Tactical Reconnaissance Camera Versus The Alternatives", Proc. SPIE 0496, Airborne Reconnaissance VIII, (11 December 1984); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.944426
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Cameras

Panoramic photography

Zoom lenses

Reconnaissance

Photography

Airborne reconnaissance

Imaging systems

RELATED CONTENT

Real Time Revisited
Proceedings of SPIE (December 23 1985)
Considerations For A Low-Altitude Reconnaissance System
Proceedings of SPIE (February 20 1987)
Tactical Arborne Reconnaissance Pod System (TARPS) today
Proceedings of SPIE (October 25 1994)
Integration of the KS-147A LOROP into the RF-5E
Proceedings of SPIE (December 23 1985)
Operational Usage of the KS 147A (LOROP) in the RF...
Proceedings of SPIE (December 23 1985)
Airborne Reconnoissance Pod Flijht Test
Proceedings of SPIE (February 20 1987)

Back to Top