12 June 2003 Impact of thin resist processes on post-etch LER
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
While evaluating 193 nm, and early versions of 157 nm and EUV resists, the lithography community has focused on post-develop LER values derived from image analysis of top-down SEM micrographs. These numbers, however, do not capture the tendency of a resist to facet and roughen during plasma etching processes. They also do not convey any information about the role of the anti-reflective coatings/hard masks in the transfer of resist roughness into the underlying substrate. From a manufacturing perspective, it is the "LER" of the final etched substrate that is more important. This paper systematically studies the impact of resist polymer platform and thickness, etching conditions, and presence of organic and inorganic anti-reflective coatings/hard masks on substrate roughening. An AFM technique, previously developed by Reynolds and Taylor, is used to measure the feature sidewall roughness as a function of etch depth. This technique enables us to calculate the sidewall roughness of the resist, ARC/hard mak and substrate surfaces simultaneously, and determine correlations that may exist between these values. The paper identifies and demonstrates patterning methodologies that can be used to achieve "smooth" substrate surfaces even when the resist is "thin".
© (2003) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Arpan P. Mahorowala, Dario L. Goldfarb, Karen Temple, Karen E. Petrillo, Dirk Pfeiffer, Katherina Babich, Marie Angelopoulos, Gregg M. Gallatin, Stacy Rasgon, Herbert H. Sawin, Scott D. Allen, Robert N. Lang, Margaret C. Lawson, Ranee W. Kwong, Kuang-Jung Chen, Wenjie Li, Pushkara Rao Varanasi, Martha I. Sanchez, Hiroshi Ito, Gregory M. Wallraff, Robert D. Allen, "Impact of thin resist processes on post-etch LER", Proc. SPIE 5039, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XX, (12 June 2003); doi: 10.1117/12.485168; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.485168
PROCEEDINGS
12 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top