16 May 2003 Optical coherence and teleportation: why a laser is a clock, and not a quantum channel
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 5111, Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics; (2003) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.497090
Event: SPIE's First International Symposium on Fluctuations and Noise, 2003, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States
It has been argued that continuous-variable quantum teleportation at optical frequencies has not been achieved because the source used was not 'truly coherent'. While arguing against Rudolph and Sanders, also accept that an 'absolute phase' is achievable, even if it has not been achieved yet. I will argue to the contrary that 'true coherence' or 'absolute phase' is always illusory, as the concept of absolute time on a scale beyond direct human experience is meaningless. All we can ever do is to use an agreed time standard. in this context, laser beam is fundamentally as good a 'clock' as any other. I explain in detail why this claim is true, and defend my argument against various objections. In the process I discuss super-selection rules, quantum work by myself and Berry and myself to show that a Heisenberg-limited laser with a mean photon number μ can synchronize M independent clocks each with a mean-square error of square root M/4μ radians2.
© (2003) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Howard M. Wiseman, "Optical coherence and teleportation: why a laser is a clock, and not a quantum channel", Proc. SPIE 5111, Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics, (16 May 2003); doi: 10.1117/12.497090; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.497090


Multiscale quantum optical networks
Proceedings of SPIE (April 25 2007)
Blackbody radiation: rosetta stone of heat bath models
Proceedings of SPIE (June 07 2007)
Quantum information processing with Schrödinger cats
Proceedings of SPIE (May 16 2003)
Instantaneous nonlocal measurements
Proceedings of SPIE (July 23 2003)
Quantum limits to feedback control of linear systems
Proceedings of SPIE (May 25 2004)

Back to Top