29 September 2004 Equivalent static vs. response spectrum: a comparison of two methods
Author Affiliations +
Developments in computer hardware and software have made analysis techniques that were formerly too expensive within the reach of most project budgets. Foremost among these has been seismic response spectrum analysis. This method yields much more accurate results than the equivalent static approach. The problem with using response spectrum analysis exclusively in the design of deflection controlled structures, such as astronomical telescopes, is that the nature of the structure minimizes the benefits of the approach. A typical response spectrum from Eurocode 8 deals with a range of natural periods between 0.1 and 5 seconds. These correspond to a frequency range of 0.2 to 10 Hz. The typical telescope structure has a minimum frequency of around 10 Hz. or greater. The result is that the response spectrum analysis involves only a narrow band of frequencies and accelerations. This result could be reliably obtained using an equivalent static analysis approach.
© (2004) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
David T. Finley, David T. Finley, Ricky A. Cribbs, Ricky A. Cribbs, } "Equivalent static vs. response spectrum: a comparison of two methods", Proc. SPIE 5495, Astronomical Structures and Mechanisms Technology, (29 September 2004); doi: 10.1117/12.552172; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.552172


Altitude-altitude mounting for an 8-m telescope
Proceedings of SPIE (June 30 1990)
Introduction of a 2.5m telescope mount
Proceedings of SPIE (July 22 2008)
Planning The National New Technology Telescope (NNTT)
Proceedings of SPIE (August 19 1986)
An Overview Of Optical Telescope Technology
Proceedings of SPIE (October 21 1985)

Back to Top