Translator Disclaimer
Paper
17 January 2005 ISO 12232 revision: determination of chrominance noise weights for noise-based ISO calculation
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 5668, Image Quality and System Performance II; (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.582447
Event: Electronic Imaging 2005, 2005, San Jose, California, United States
Abstract
Three ISO speeds for digital cameras, yielding the minimum, typical, and maximum exposures recommended for use, are defined in International Standard 12232, which is under revision. The typical and minimum acceptable exposures are based upon signal-to-noise criteria, described in ISO 12232, in which visual (perceptually relevant) noise is computed as a weighted sum of variances from a luminance (Y) and two chrominance (R-Y, B-Y) channels. The weights of the two chrominance variances, C1 (R-Y) and C2 (B-Y), are in need of reevaluation because of: (1) changes in linearization procedures being introduced in the revision of ISO 12232; (2) the limited nature of the original experiment to determine C1 and C2 and (3) suspicion that the initial C1 and C2 values were too high, overemphasizing the contributions of chrominance noise to perception. This paper describes the image simulations, psychophysical experiment, and analyses conducted to determine new values for the chrominance weights to be used in the revised standard. The values obtained, C1 = 0.279 (standard error = SE = 0.025) and C2 = 0.088 (SE = 0.017), are approximately one-half as large as those in the original version of ISO 12232. Systematic variation of the weights with the color of noise-sensitive uniform areas in the scenes is observed, but the effect is small and does not have a practical impact on the standard.
© (2005) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Sean C. Kelly V.D.M. and Brian W. Keelan "ISO 12232 revision: determination of chrominance noise weights for noise-based ISO calculation", Proc. SPIE 5668, Image Quality and System Performance II, (17 January 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.582447
PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top