Models for reticle performance and comparison of direct measurement

Terrence E. Zavecz; Ray Hoobler

doi:10.1117/12.600235

12 May 2005 Models for reticle performance and comparison of direct measurement

Terrence E. Zavecz, Ray Hoobler

Proceedings Volume 5754, Optical Microlithography XVIII; (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.600235
Event: Microlithography 2005, 2005, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

It’s commonly reported that a difference exists between directly measured reticle feature dimensions and those produced in the final lithographic image. Quantifying this mask error function (MEF) and the sources of the perturbation has been the topic of many papers of the past several years. Past studies have been content to evaluate these functions by statistical averaging thereby neglecting the potential influence of process and exposure contributions. The material presented here represents the findings of an extensive study of reticle-process interactions. Phase I of the evaluation consisted of focus and dose exposures of the reticle and subsequent modeling of the full-profile response. This analysis provided extensive information on the optimum-printed feature profiles while removing the contribution of across-field focus variations. The reticle was directly characterized using both conventional SEM and a new Nanometrics OCD Scatterometer technique. The full-field modeled response surface of the directly measured feature characteristics are then used to calculate the across-field MEF and provide an improved estimate of the true response of the feature to exposure. Phase II of the analysis turns its attention to characterization of the full-wafer process response. Both the modeled and directly measured reticle surfaces were removed from Scatterometry measured full-wafer exposures. Normal process variations consisting of photoresist and ARC thickness volatility are next used to show the response of the printed feature. Finally a summary of the relative contribution of each process perturbation to the feature profile error budget is discussed.

Citation Download Citation

Terrence E. Zavecz and Ray Hoobler "Models for reticle performance and comparison of direct measurement", Proc. SPIE 5754, Optical Microlithography XVIII, (12 May 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.600235

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available