Paper
10 June 2005 Optimization of the HSTAMIDS landmine detection algorithm through genetic algorithms
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
CyTerra's dual sensor HSTAMIDS system has demonstrated promising landmine detection capabilities in extensive government-run field tests. Further optimization of the successful PentAD algorithm is desirable to maintain the high probability of detection (Pd) while lowering the false alarm rate (FAR). PentAD contains several input parameters, making such optimization using standard Monte-Carlo techniques too computationally intensive. Genetic algorithm techniques, which formerly provided substantial improvement in the detection performance of the metal detector sensor algorithm alone, have been applied to further optimize the numerical values of the dual-sensor algorithm parameters in more practical time frames. Genetic algorithm techniques have also been applied to choose among several sub-models and fusion techniques to potentially train the HSTAMIDS system in new ways. An analysis of genetic algorithm results has indicated that ground type may have a significant impact on the optimal parameter set. In this presentation we discuss the performance of the resulting ground-type based genetic algorithm as applied to field data.
© (2005) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Ravi Konduri, Geoff Solomon, Richard McCoy, Herbert Duvoisin, and Elizabeth Bartosz "Optimization of the HSTAMIDS landmine detection algorithm through genetic algorithms", Proc. SPIE 5794, Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets X, (10 June 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.603665
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Genetic algorithms

Land mines

Detection and tracking algorithms

Sensors

Optimization (mathematics)

Genetics

Principal component analysis

Back to Top