19 May 2005 Adversarial reasoning and resource allocation: the LG approach
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Many existing automated tools purporting to model the intelligent enemy utilize a fixed battle plan for the enemy while using flexible decisions of human players for the friendly side. According to the Naval Studies Board, "It is an open secret and a point of distress ... that too much of the substantive content of such M&S has its origin in anecdote, ..., or a narrow construction tied to stereotypical current practices of 'doctrinally correct behavior.'" Clearly, such runs lack objectivity by being heavily skewed in favor of the friendly forces. Presently, the military branches employ a variety of game-based simulators and synthetic environments, with manual (i.e., user-based) decision-making, for training and other purposes. However, without an ability to automatically generate the best strategies, tactics, and COA, the games serve mostly to display the current situation rather than form a basis for automated decision-making and effective training. We solve the problem of adversarial reasoning as a gaming problem employing Linguistic Geometry (LG), a new type of game theory demonstrating significant increase in size in gaming problems solvable in real and near-real time. It appears to be a viable approach for solving such practical problems as mission planning and battle management. Essentially, LG may be structured into two layers: game construction and game solving. Game construction includes construction of a game called an LG hypergame based on a hierarchy of Abstract Board Games (ABG). Game solving includes resource allocation for constructing an advantageous initial game state and strategy generation to reach a desirable final game state in the course of the game.
© (2005) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Boris Stilman, Boris Stilman, Vladimir Yakhnis, Vladimir Yakhnis, Oleg Umanskiy, Oleg Umanskiy, Ron Boyd, Ron Boyd, } "Adversarial reasoning and resource allocation: the LG approach", Proc. SPIE 5805, Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science IX, (19 May 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.609725; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.609725
PROCEEDINGS
12 PAGES


SHARE
RELATED CONTENT

Benchmarks for target tracking
Proceedings of SPIE (September 16 2011)
Variation of rolling element bearing friction torque
Proceedings of SPIE (October 13 2008)
Thoughts on betting your beast of burden and winning ...
Proceedings of SPIE (August 08 2003)
LG hypergames for effects-based operations
Proceedings of SPIE (September 04 2003)
Linquistic geometry: new technology for decision support
Proceedings of SPIE (September 04 2003)

Back to Top