19 May 2005 Comparison of deterministic and probabilistic model matching techniques for laser radar target recognition
Author Affiliations +
The paper compares the target identification performance of conventional model matching criteria and of new probabilistic techniques based on Bayesian hypothesis generation and verification. Match techniques are categorized into two types: those requiring target segmentation results and those which do not. Applied to low-resolution laser radar images of military vehicles, deterministic techniques using no segmentation results had the lowest target identification rates. New probabilistic techniques using no segmentation results are introduced, having significantly higher target identification rates than the best known deterministic procedures. The best results were attained by a probabilistic matching approach requiring target segmentation. Using certain simplifying assumptions, the latter technique can be reformulated as a deterministic procedure, involving no probabilities on scene parameters, and having almost the same target identification performance.
© (2005) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Walter Armbruster, "Comparison of deterministic and probabilistic model matching techniques for laser radar target recognition", Proc. SPIE 5807, Automatic Target Recognition XV, (19 May 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.602044; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.602044


Maritime target identification in flash-ladar imagery
Proceedings of SPIE (May 02 2012)
ATR paradigm comparison with emphasis on model-based vision
Proceedings of SPIE (February 01 1992)
Model-based object recognition in range imagery
Proceedings of SPIE (September 23 2009)
Parameter adaptation for target recognition in LADAR
Proceedings of SPIE (May 19 2005)
An approach to target detection in forested scenes
Proceedings of SPIE (April 16 2008)

Back to Top