Effects of mask bias on the mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) for low k1 lithography process

Yu Ya Chang; Yuan-Hsun Wu; Chiang-Lin Shih; Jengping Lin; Francis Kan; Jimmy Lin

doi:10.1117/12.617212

28 June 2005 Effects of mask bias on the mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) for low k1 lithography process

Yu Ya Chang, Yuan-Hsun Wu, Chiang-Lin Shih, Jengping Lin, Francis Kan, Jimmy Lin

Proceedings Volume 5853, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XII; (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.617212
Event: Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology XII, 2005, Yokohama, Japan

Abstract

Mask Error Enhancement Factor(MEEF) has recently become an important topic in determining requirements of process. MEEF is the ratio of the CD range on the wafer and the expected CD range due to the mask. It indicates that mask CD errors are in effect magnified during the optical transfer to the wafer. The resolution capability of a optical system is given by Rayleigh’s criterions: Resolution=k1*λ/NA, where λ is the wavelength of the light used and NA is defined as the sine of the maximum half angle(α) of diffracted light which can enter the lens. The k1 resolution-scaling factor (k1=CD*NA/λ) is a practical measure for expressing imaging feasibility of a given optical system. It is a important parameter and direct proportion to resolution requirement. For driving critical CD dimension contraction bellow 0.11μm, lower k1 factor is needed. In this work we use strong OAI (Quasar 90° ) to push k1 reach 0.29 by KrF exposure tool and analysis the MEEF value on 90nm generation. The simulation result shows the predicted MEEF value is close to 9 while using KrF to 90nm resolution and real MEEF value from exposuring Line/Space pattern on wafer data is 6.2. In such high MEEF process, it is very important to control mask CD accuracy. We bring up a test pattern of serial combinations with different Line/Space dimension with the same pitch size to reduce the mask array CD variation. Finally, we compare the process window (PW) between equal and nonequal Line/Space situation. The process window can be improved 18% while line width extends from 90nm to 95nm at fixed pitch 180nm.

Citation Download Citation

Yu Ya Chang, Yuan-Hsun Wu, Chiang-Lin Shih, Jengping Lin, Francis Kan, and Jimmy Lin "Effects of mask bias on the mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) for low k1 lithography process", Proc. SPIE 5853, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XII, (28 June 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.617212

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available