CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
Advanced Search >
Home > Proceedings > Volume 5992 > Article
Translator Disclaimer
7 November 2005 How large MEEF is acceptable for the low-k1 lithography?
Dongseok Nam; Dong-Gun Lee; Byunggook Kim; Seong-Yong Moon; Seong-Woon Choi; Woo-Sung Han
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 5992, 25th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology; 59922W (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.632066
Event: SPIE Photomask Technology, 2005, Monterey, California, United States
Abstract
In the photo-lithography process, a mask is one of the most important items because its imperfection induces the variation of critical dimension (CD) and becomes the source of the CD error on the wafer. The CD error amplification is denoted by using Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF)(1,2) and related to the photo-lithography process. Nowadays MEEF increases conspicuously as the device shrinks so fast. Therefore the mean-to-target (MTT) and the uniformity of the mask CD are very important factors to reduce the effect of high MEEF. In general, the process constant k1 factor has been cited to denote the capability of the photo process for a certain resolution. However MEEF can describe the process difficulty well because it depends on the layout design and the process conditions although the designed patterns have the same design rule. In this study the MEEFs of sub-80nm DRAM patterns(3) are discussed with the process constant k1, MTT and the mask CD uniformity. And then the results are compared with the simulation and the wafer process data. Considering the mask specification calculated from the wafer specification and MEEF, the photo tool and process upgrade is necessary to reduce MEEF and to have the mask fabrication tolerance.
© (2005) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation Download Citation
Dongseok Nam, Dong-Gun Lee, Byunggook Kim, Seong-Yong Moon, Seong-Woon Choi, and Woo-Sung Han "How large MEEF is acceptable for the low-k1 lithography?", Proc. SPIE 5992, 25th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, 59922W (7 November 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.632066; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.632066
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
PERSONAL SIGN IN
Full access may be available with your subscription
 
Forgot your username?
Forgot your password?
No SPIE account? Create an account
Institutional Access:
Sign in with your institutional credentials
PURCHASE THIS CONTENT
SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY
50 downloads per 1-year subscription
Members: $195
Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART
25 downloads per 1 - year subscription
Members: $145
Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART
PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE
Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available
Members: $14.40
Non-members: $18.00 ADD TO CART
PROCEEDINGS
 8 PAGES
DOWNLOAD PDF SAVE TO MY LIBRARY
SHARE
GET CITATION
< Previous Article
|
Next Article >
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
RELATED CONTENT
Subscribe to Digital Library
Receive Erratum Email Alert
Back to Top