Shearography versus Holography in Nondestructive Evaluation

Y. Y. Hung

doi:10.1117/12.966610

1 January 1986 Shearography versus Holography in Nondestructive Evaluation

Y. Y. Hung

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 0604, Holographic Nondestructive Testing; (1986) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.966610
Event: O-E/LASE'86 Symposium, 1986, Los Angeles, CA, United States

Abstract

The demands for greater product quality and product reliability has created a need for better techniques of nondestructive evaluation. Each of the available techniques including ultrasonic, acoustical emissions, radiography, thermography, magnetic particles, eddy current, dye penetrant, and optical methods such as holography and shearography has its unique advantages and disadvantages. The selection of one technique depends on the particular objective of the evaluation. When selecting a technique, it is important to have a sound knowledge of the capabilities as well as limitations of each technique. This paper will give a thorough review of two major optical methods of nondestructive testing: holography and shearography.

Citation Download Citation

Y. Y. Hung "Shearography versus Holography in Nondestructive Evaluation", Proc. SPIE 0604, Holographic Nondestructive Testing, (1 January 1986); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.966610

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE