Translator Disclaimer
19 May 2006 Comparison of tracklet methods with deterministic dynamics and false signals
Author Affiliations +
Track fusion processing is complicated because the estimation errors of a local track and a fusion track for the same target are usually cross-correlated. If these errors are cross-correlated, that should be taken into account when designing the data association processing and the filter used to combine the track data. An approach to dealing with this cross-correlation is to use tracklets. One of the important issues in tracklet fusion performance is whether the dynamics are deterministic, e.g., no filter process noise and no target maneuver. A number of different tracklet methods have been designed. This paper presents a comparison a tracklets-from-tracks approach to a tracklets-from-measurements approach. Tracklet fusion performance is also compared to centralized measurement fusion performance. The emphasis is on performance with targets that exhibit deterministic dynamics and the possibility of measurements caused by false signals.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Oliver E. Drummond and David Dana-Bashian "Comparison of tracklet methods with deterministic dynamics and false signals", Proc. SPIE 6236, Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 2006, 62360Z (19 May 2006);


Perception-net-based maneuvering target tracking
Proceedings of SPIE (July 15 1999)
Feedback in track fusion without process noise
Proceedings of SPIE (September 01 1995)
Mitigation of biases using the Schmidt-Kalman filter
Proceedings of SPIE (September 21 2007)
A group tracking algorithm for ground vehicle convoys
Proceedings of SPIE (March 28 2005)

Back to Top