Translator Disclaimer
27 June 2006 Coherent integrations, fringe modeling, and bootstrapping with the NPOI
Author Affiliations +
Atmospheric turbulence is a major impediment to ground-based optical interferometry. It causes fringes to move on ms time-scales, forcing very short exposures. Because of the semi-random phase shifts, the traditional approach averages exposure power spectra to build signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This incoherent average has two problems: (1) A bias of correlated noise is introduced which must be subtracted. The smaller the visibility/the fainter the target star, the more diffcult bias subtraction becomes. SNR builds only slowly in this case. Unfortunately, these most difficult small visibility baselines contain most of the image information. (2) Baseline phase information is discarded. These are serious challenges to imaging with ground based optical interferometers. But if we were able to determine fringe phase, we could shift and integrate all the short exposures. We would then eliminate the bias problem, improve the SNR, and we would have preserved most of the phase information. This coherent averaging becomes possible with multi-spectral measurements. The group delay presents one option for determining phase. A more accurate approach is to use a time-dependent model of the fringe. For the most interesting low-visibility baselines, the atmospheric phase information can be bootstrapped from phase determinations on high-visibility baselines using the closure relation. The NPOI, with 32 spectral channels and a bootstrapping configuration, is well-suited for these approaches. We will illustrate how the fringe modeling approach works, compare it to the group-delay approach, and show how these approaches can be used to derive bias-free visibility amplitude and phase information. Coherent integration provides the highest signal-to-noise (SNR) improvement precisely in the situations where SNR builds most slowly using incoherent averaging. Coherent integration also produces high-SNR phase measurements which are calibration-free and thus have high real uncertainties as well. In this paper we will show how to coherently integration on NPOI data, and how to use baseline visibilities and calibrate coherently integrated visibility amplitudes.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Anders M. Jorgensen, Dave Mozurkewich, Henrique Schmitt, J. Thomas Armstrong, G. Charmaine Gilbreath, Robert Hindsley, Thomas A. Pauls, and Deane M. Peterson "Coherent integrations, fringe modeling, and bootstrapping with the NPOI", Proc. SPIE 6268, Advances in Stellar Interferometry, 62681H (27 June 2006);


Coherent integration results from the NPOI
Proceedings of SPIE (July 21 2010)
Observation planning tools for the ESO VLT interferometer
Proceedings of SPIE (September 16 2004)
Estimation of fringe parameters
Proceedings of SPIE (October 20 2004)
Coherent integration of NPOI phase closure data on Altair
Proceedings of SPIE (October 20 2004)
Resolving the effects of rotation in early type stars
Proceedings of SPIE (October 20 2004)
Practical coherent integration with the NPOI
Proceedings of SPIE (July 28 2008)
Interferometric measurements of stellar intensity profiles
Proceedings of SPIE (February 21 2003)

Back to Top