Paper
20 October 2006 Feasibility study of embedded binary masks
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Towards hyper-NA lithography, the mask blank and mask topography have the opportunity to be optimized for imaging performance. At the resolution limit of hyper-NA imaging, depth of focus and MEEF become critical for conventional mask stacks. Although conventional binary masks (BIM) are the simplest and the most cost-effective to manufacture, other mask types can provide better imaging performance. This study explores the feasibility and imaging performance of an embedded binary mask (EBM). The EBM emphasizes the simple binary manufacturing process with the application of an additional transparent layer. Two types of EBM's, topographic and planar, were evaluated. The mask diffraction properties are studied by both measurements using an ellipsometer (Woollam VUV-VASE) and simulations using Solid-E 3.2.0.2 (Sigma-C). In this first phase, the imaging performance is assessed by rigorous simulations for three different illumination conditions (cross-quad, quasar and annular). By comparing metrics such as contrast, NILS, MEEF, and process windows, simulations determined that an optimized topographic EBM has a better overall through-pitch imaging performance than a conventional binary mask. This preliminary investigation suggests that an embedded binary mask may be considered as an RET option for hyper-NA imaging improvement.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Michael Cangemi, Vicky Philipsen, Leonardus H. A. Leunissen, and Darren Taylor "Feasibility study of embedded binary masks", Proc. SPIE 6349, Photomask Technology 2006, 63490L (20 October 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.686290
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Electron beam melting

Binary data

Diffraction

Nanoimprint lithography

Polarization

Lithography

Back to Top