22 March 2007 C-arm calibration: is it really necessary?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
C-arm fluoroscopy is modelled as a perspective projection, the parameters of which are estimated through a calibration procedure. It has been universally accepted that precise intra-procedural calibration is a prerequisite for accurate quantitative C-arm fluoroscopy guidance. Calibration, however, significantly adds to system complexity, which is a major impediment to clinical practice. We challenge the status quo by questioning the assumption that precise intra-procedural C-arm calibration is really necessary. Using our theoretical framework, we derive upper bounds on the effect of mis-calibration on various algorithms like C-arm tracking, 3D reconstruction and surgical guidance in virtual fluoroscopy - some of the most common techniques in intra-operative fluoroscopic guidance. To derive bounds as a function of mis-calibration, we model the error using an a.ne transform. This is fairly intuitive, since small amounts of mis-calibration result in predictably linear transformation of the reconstruction space. Experiments indicate the validity of this approximation even for 50 mm mis-calibrations.
© (2007) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Ameet Kumar Jain, Ameet Kumar Jain, Michael An, Michael An, Nicha Chitphakdithai, Nicha Chitphakdithai, Gouthami Chintalapani, Gouthami Chintalapani, Gabor Fichtinger, Gabor Fichtinger, } "C-arm calibration: is it really necessary?", Proc. SPIE 6509, Medical Imaging 2007: Visualization and Image-Guided Procedures, 65092U (22 March 2007); doi: 10.1117/12.712301; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.712301
PROCEEDINGS
16 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top