Setting MRC rules: balancing inspection capabilities, defect sensitivity, and OPC

Ian Stobert; James Bruce; Mohamed Gheith; Ahmed Seoud

doi:10.1117/12.712418

4 April 2007 Setting MRC rules: balancing inspection capabilities, defect sensitivity, and OPC

Ian Stobert, James Bruce, Mohamed Gheith, Ahmed Seoud

Proceedings Volume 6518, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXI; 65180B (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.712418
Event: SPIE Advanced Lithography, 2007, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

One of the challenges associated with shrinking design dimensions is finding photomask inspection settings which achieve sufficient defect detection capabilities while supporting aggressive Optical Proximity Correction (OPC). The most recent technology nodes require very aggressive and advanced Resolution Enhancement Techniques (RETs) which involve printing small features that are challenging for mask inspection tools. We examine the problems associated with constraining Models-Based OPC with mask inspection driven rules. We give examples of a 45nm technology node contact layer design which will receive sub-optimal OPC treatment due to mask inspection constraints. We then take the mask defect specification typically used for this mask layer, and use Monte Carlo simulation methods to place minimum sized simulated defects in various locations in close proximity to these sensitive layouts. Simulations of the optimal OPC are compared to optimal OPC with defects, and to the sub-optimal constrained OPC. Using knowledge about the frequency of small defects on masks, one can compare the risks associated with small mask defects to the risks associated with sub-optimal OPC. This exercise demonstrates that there are some instances where mask rules based on inspection capabilities and defect sensitivity alone can be problematic, and that OPC requirements need to be taken into account when choosing a defect specification and an inspection strategy. We conclude by proposing a strategy for balancing these requirements in a practical manner.

Citation Download Citation

Ian Stobert, James Bruce, Mohamed Gheith, and Ahmed Seoud "Setting MRC rules: balancing inspection capabilities, defect sensitivity, and OPC", Proc. SPIE 6518, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXI, 65180B (4 April 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.712418

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Optical proximity correction

Photomasks

Inspection

Semiconducting wafers

Monte Carlo methods

Defect inspection

Image quality

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years