ACLV driven double-patterning decomposition with extensively added printing assist features (PrAFs)

Jason E. Meiring; Henning Haffner; Carlos Fonseca; Scott D. Halle; Scott M. Mansfield

doi:10.1117/12.712558

26 March 2007 ACLV driven double-patterning decomposition with extensively added printing assist features (PrAFs)

Jason E. Meiring, Henning Haffner, Carlos Fonseca, Scott D. Halle, Scott M. Mansfield

Proceedings Volume 6520, Optical Microlithography XX; 65201U (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.712558
Event: SPIE Advanced Lithography, 2007, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

Double exposure lithography processes can offer a significant yield enhancement for challenging circuit designs. Many decomposition techniques (i.e. the process of dividing the layout design into first and second exposures) are possible, but the focus of this paper is on the use of a secondary "cut" mask to trim away extraneous features left from the first exposure. This approach has the advantage that each exposure only needs to support a subset of critical features (e.g. dense lines with the first exposure, isolated spaces with the second one). The extraneous features ("printing assist features" or PrAFs) are designed to support the process window of critical features much like the role of the sub-resolution assist features (SRAFs) in conventional processes. However, the printing nature of PrAFs leads to many more design options, and hence a greater process exploration space, than are available for SRAFs. A decomposition scheme using PrAFs was developed for a gate level process. A critical driver of the work was to deliver improved across-chip linewidth variation (ACLV) performance versus an optimized single-exposure process. A variety of PrAF techniques were investigated, including block type features, variable-pitch PrAFs, and constant assist-to-feature spacing (similar to SRAF placement). A PrAF scheme similar to standard SRAF rules was chosen as the optimal solution. The resulting ACLV benefits occurred mainly in the intermediate pitch range. For dense pitches, the ACLV was mostly unchanged, since in that regime neither process used assist features. The PrAF process showed a benefit of 10-44% improvement of ACLV in the mid-range pitches, but up to 18% worse ACLV for isolated pitches. Thus, the optimal double exposure solution was a combination of SRAFs and PrAFs that achieved the ACLV benefits of both.

Citation Download Citation

Jason E. Meiring, Henning Haffner, Carlos Fonseca, Scott D. Halle, and Scott M. Mansfield "ACLV driven double-patterning decomposition with extensively added printing assist features (PrAFs)", Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, 65201U (26 March 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.712558

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available