Translator Disclaimer
Paper
3 May 2007 Production evaluation of automated reticle defect printability prediction application
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 6533, 23rd European Mask and Lithography Conference; 65330A (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.736495
Event: European Mask and Lithography Conference2007, 2007, Grenoble, France
Abstract
The growing complexity of reticles and continual tightening of defect specifications causes the reticle defect disposition function to become increasingly difficult. No longer can defect specifications be distilled to a single number, nor can past simple classification rules be employed due to the effects of MEEF on actual printing behavior. The mask maker now requires lithography-based rules and capabilities for making these go/no-go decisions at the reticle inspection step. We have evaluated an automated system that predicts the lithographic significance of reticle defects using PROLITHTM technology. This printability prediction tool was evaluated and tested in a production environment using both standard test reticles and production samples in an advanced reticle manufacturing environment. Reference measurements on Zeiss AIMSTM systems were used to assess the accuracy of predicted results. The application, called the Automated Mask Defect Disposition System, or AMDD, models defective and non-defective test and reference images generated by a high-resolution inspection system. The results were calculated according to the wafer exposure conditions given at setup such that the reticle could be judged for its 'fitness-for-use' from a lithographic standpoint rather than from a simple physical measurement of the film materials. We present the methods and empirical results comparing 1D and 2D Intensity Difference Metrics (IDMs) with respect to AIMS and discuss the results of usability and productivity studies as they apply to manufacturing environments.
© (2007) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
William B. Howard, Scott Pomeroy, Raphael Moses, and Thomas Thaler "Production evaluation of automated reticle defect printability prediction application", Proc. SPIE 6533, 23rd European Mask and Lithography Conference, 65330A (3 May 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.736495
PROCEEDINGS
7 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
RELATED CONTENT

Patterning 80 nm gates using 248 nm lithography an...
Proceedings of SPIE (September 14 2001)
Another look at stepper lens reduction and field size
Proceedings of SPIE (July 19 2000)
Mask cost and specification
Proceedings of SPIE (December 17 2003)
New yield-aware mask strategies
Proceedings of SPIE (May 19 2011)

Back to Top