Finding a fusion metric that best reflects human observer preference

Richard K. Moore; Carl E. Halford; Chris L. Howell

doi:10.1117/12.719527

30 April 2007 Finding a fusion metric that best reflects human observer preference

Richard K. Moore, Carl E. Halford, Chris L. Howell

Proceedings Volume 6543, Infrared Imaging Systems: Design, Analysis, Modeling, and Testing XVIII; 65430N (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.719527
Event: Defense and Security Symposium, 2007, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

A perception test determined which of several image fusion metrics best correlates with relative observer preference. Many fusion techniques and fusion metrics have been proposed, but there is a need to relate them to a human observer's measure of image quality. LWIR and MWIR images were fused using techniques based on the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), the Shift-Invariant DWT (SIDWT), Gabor filters, Pixel averaging, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Two different sets of fused images were generated from urban scenes. The quality of the fused images was then measured using the mutual information metric (MINF), fusion quality index (FQI), edge-dependent fusion quality index (EDFQI), weighted-fusion quality index (WFQI), and the mean-squared errors between the fused and source images (MS(F-L), MS(F-M)). A paired-comparison perception test determined how observers rated the relative quality of the fused images. The observers based their decisions on the noticeable presence or absence of information, blur, and distortion in the images. The observer preferences were then correlated with the fusion metric outputs to see which metric best represents observer preference. The results of the paired comparison test show that the mutual information metric most consistently correlates well with the measured observer preferences.

Citation Download Citation

Richard K. Moore, Carl E. Halford, and Chris L. Howell "Finding a fusion metric that best reflects human observer preference", Proc. SPIE 6543, Infrared Imaging Systems: Design, Analysis, Modeling, and Testing XVIII, 65430N (30 April 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.719527

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available