30 October 2007 The MEEF NILS divergence for low k1 lithography
Author Affiliations +
For tight pitch patterning with sub-wavelength mask features, simulations and wafer data show that many mask stacks that provide superior image contrast, can provide inferior MEEF performance. For example, 6% MoSi EPSM is found to have higher MEEF than binary masks despite having better contrast and exposure latitude when equal lines and spaces on the mask are used to pattern equal lines and spaces on the wafer. Likewise, the deposition of SiO2 on-top of the chrome surface of a binary mask improves contrast but degrades MEEF compared to a binary mask. When contrast is varied by mask stack or by print bias, MEEF is poorly correlated with contrast and often increases with increasing contrast. The optimal print bias for exposure latitude is significantly different than the optimum print bias for MEEF. MEEF, on the other hand, is highly correlated with the difference between maximum and minimum intensity when one varies mask stack, print bias and illumination. Analytical MEEF equations are derived that support this strong relationship between MEEF and the difference between maximum and minimum intensity.
© (2007) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Richard Schenker, Richard Schenker, Wen-hao Cheng, Wen-hao Cheng, Gary Allen, Gary Allen, } "The MEEF NILS divergence for low k1 lithography", Proc. SPIE 6730, Photomask Technology 2007, 67301M (30 October 2007); doi: 10.1117/12.742273; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.742273


New grade of 9 inch size mask blanks for 450mm...
Proceedings of SPIE (November 10 2015)
Looking back artwork and mask making in Dresden for...
Proceedings of SPIE (June 01 2004)
Mask error enhancement factor
Proceedings of SPIE (February 02 2000)
Aerial image based design of rim phase shift masks with...
Proceedings of SPIE (August 07 1993)
Mask Duplicator, Using Vacuum Contact
Proceedings of SPIE (February 28 1974)
Flexure of photomasks in manufacturing and application
Proceedings of SPIE (February 14 1994)

Back to Top