You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Microelectronics industry leaders routinely name the cost and cycle time of mask technology and mask supply as top
critical issues. A survey was created with support from SEMATECH and administered by SEMI North America to
gather information about the mask industry as an objective assessment of its overall condition. This year's survey
data were presented in detail at BACUS and the detailed trend analysis presented at EMLC. The survey is designed
with the input of semiconductor company mask technologists, merchant mask suppliers, and industry equipment
makers. This year's assessment is the sixth in the current series of annual reports. With continued industry support,
the report can be used as a baseline to gain perspective on the technical and business status of the mask and
microelectronics industries. The report will continue to serve as a valuable reference to identify the strengths and
opportunities of the mask industry. The results will be used to guide future investments on critical path issues. This
year's survey is basically the same as the 2005 and 2006 surveys. Questions are grouped into eight categories:
General Business Profile Information, Data Processing, Yields and Yield Loss, Mechanisms, Delivery Times,
Returns and Services, Operating Cost Factors, and Equipment Utilization. Within each category is a multitude of
questions that creates a detailed profile of both the business and technical status of the critical mask industry. Note:
the questions covering operating cost factors and equipment utilization were added to the survey only in 2005;
therefore, meaningful trend analysis is not available.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Gilbert Shelden, Patricia Marmillion, Greg Hughes, "Mask industry assessment trend analysis," Proc. SPIE 6792, 24th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 679202 (2 May 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.798511