Visual adaptation: softcopy image contribution to the observer's field of view

R. J. Toomey; K. Curran; C. D'Helft; M. B. Joyce; J. Stowe; J. T. Ryan; M. F. McEntee; D. J. Manning; P. C. Brennan

doi:10.1117/12.770305

6 March 2008 Visual adaptation: softcopy image contribution to the observer's field of view

R. J. Toomey, K. Curran, C. D'Helft, M. B. Joyce, J. Stowe, J. T. Ryan, M. F. McEntee, D. J. Manning, P. C. Brennan

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 6917, Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 69170O (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770305
Event: Medical Imaging, 2008, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Purpose Detection of low-contrast details is highly dependent on the adaptation state of the eye. It is important therefore that the average luminance of the observer's field of view (FOV) matches those of softcopy radiological images. This study establishes the percentage of FOV filled by workstations at various viewing distances. Methods Five observers stood at viewing distances of 20, 30 and 50cm from a homogenous white surface and were instructed to continuously focus on a fixed object at a height appropriate level. A dark indicator was held at this object and then moved steadily until the observer could no longer perceive it in his/her peripheral vision. This was performed at 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° clockwise from the median sagittal plane. Distances were recorded, radii calculated and observer and mean FOV areas established. These values were then compared with areas of typical high and low specification workstations. Results Individual and mean FOVs were 7660, 15463 and 30075cm² at viewing distances of 20, 30 and 50cm respectively. High and low specification monitors with respective areas of 1576.25 and 921.25cm² contributed between 5 to 21% and 3 to 12% respectively to the total FOV depending on observer distance. Limited inter-observer variances were noted. Conclusions Radiology workstations typically comprise between only 3 and 21% of the observer's FOV. This demonstrates the importance of measuring ambient light levels and surface reflection coefficients in order to maximise adaptation and observer's perception of low contrast detail and minimise eye strain.

Citation Download Citation

R. J. Toomey, K. Curran, C. D'Helft, M. B. Joyce, J. Stowe, J. T. Ryan, M. F. McEntee, D. J. Manning, and P. C. Brennan "Visual adaptation: softcopy image contribution to the observer's field of view", Proc. SPIE 6917, Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 69170O (6 March 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.770305

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
6 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Eye

Visualization

LCDs

Light sources and illumination

Radiology

Diagnostics

Medical imaging

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years