14 February 2009 Stereoscopic display technologies, interaction paradigms, and rendering approaches for neurosurgical visualization
Author Affiliations +
We conducted a comparative study of different stereoscopic display modalities (head-mounted display, polarized projection, and multiview lenticular display) to evaluate their efficacy in supporting manipulation and understanding of 3D content, specifically, in the context of neurosurgical visualization. Our study was intended to quantify the differences in resulting task performance between these choices of display technology. The experimental configuration involved a segmented brain vasculature and a simulated tumor. Subjects were asked to manipulate the vasculature and a pen-like virtual probe in order to define a vessel-free path from cortical surface to the targeted tumor. Because of the anatomical complexity, defining such a path can be a challenging task. To evaluate the system, we quantified performance differences under three different stereoscopic viewing conditions. Our results indicate that, on average, participants achieved best performance using polarized projection, and worst with the multiview lenticular display. These quantitative measurements were further reinforced by the subjects' responses to our post-test questionnaire regarding personal preferences.
© (2009) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Jeremy R. Cooperstock, Jeremy R. Cooperstock, Guangyu Wang, Guangyu Wang, "Stereoscopic display technologies, interaction paradigms, and rendering approaches for neurosurgical visualization", Proc. SPIE 7237, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XX, 723703 (14 February 2009); doi: 10.1117/12.808350; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.808350

Back to Top