13 March 2009 A theoretical treatment of the sources of variability in the output of pattern classifiers
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 72630Y (2009); doi: 10.1117/12.811744
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2009, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando Area), Florida, United States
Abstract
Previously, several instances of variability in the output of pattern classifiers that have the same Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve have been observed. We present a theoretical framework for understanding some sources of this variability, which result in classifiers with monotonically related outputs. We restrict our analysis to pattern classifiers that discriminate between two linearly separable classes. We show that variability in the output of pattern classifiers can arise due to differences in the functional mappings between their inputs and outputs. We further identify some practical situations wherein such variability in the output of such pattern classifiers arises. These include situations in which there are differences in (a) the datasets employed for training and evaluation of classifiers, (b) the a priori probabilities of the two classes, or (c) the stochastic processes employed for training the different pattern classifiers. Previously, we proposed a technique based on the matching of the histograms of differently distributed classifier output to reduce the variability in their diagnostic performance and their output values. Here, we prove theoretically and demonstrate empirically on simulated data, that for monotonically related classifier outputs, this technique successfully learns the true monotonic transformation function that exists between different pattern classifier outputs.
© (2009) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Shalini Gupta, Mia K. Markey, "A theoretical treatment of the sources of variability in the output of pattern classifiers", Proc. SPIE 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 72630Y (13 March 2009); doi: 10.1117/12.811744; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.811744
PROCEEDINGS
11 PAGES


SHARE
KEYWORDS
Calibration

Diagnostics

Stochastic processes

Supercontinuum generation

Receivers

Statistical analysis

Artificial neural networks

Back to Top