You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
29 December 2008Uncertainty characterization in spatial categorical information
Uncertainty is an integral component in thematic mapping, and descriptors such as percent correctly classified pixels
(PCC) and Kappa coefficients of agreement have been devised as thematic accuracy metrics. However, such spatially
averaged measures neither offer hints about spatial variation in accuracy, nor are they useful for error propagation in
derivatives due to the deficiency that spatial dependency is not properly accommodated. Geostatistics provides a good
framework for spatial uncertainty characterization, as conditional simulation is designed for generating equal-probable
realizations of often sparsely sampled fields of concern, which can be summarized for error statistics or subjected to
particular geo-processing to facilitate error propagation. Often, for modeling errors in area-class maps depicting
distributions of spatial classes, stochastic indicator simulation is employed. Unfortunately, indicator approaches suffer
from non-invariant behaviors in simulated classes as class labels are drawn from intervals of class probabilities that are
arbitrarily ordered. Discriminant space-based models have been proposed to enhance consistency in mapping spatial
classes and replicability in modeling spatial categorical uncertainty. This paper explores bivariate (rather than univariate)
discriminant models and extends uncertainty modeling from single-time to bi-temporal area-class maps. Experiment
using simulated data sets was carried out to quantify errors in area classes and their propagation in change analysis. It
was found that there are significant differences between the results obtained by discriminant models and those by
indicator geostatistics. Further investigations are anticipated incorporating real data for mapping and propagating errors
in area classes.
Jingxiong Zhang,Jinping Zhang, andNa Yao
"Uncertainty characterization in spatial categorical information", Proc. SPIE 7285, International Conference on Earth Observation Data Processing and Analysis (ICEODPA), 72853S (29 December 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.815656
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Jingxiong Zhang, Jinping Zhang, Na Yao, "Uncertainty characterization in spatial categorical information," Proc. SPIE 7285, International Conference on Earth Observation Data Processing and Analysis (ICEODPA), 72853S (29 December 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.815656