Flight performance using a hyperstereo helmet-mounted display: post-flight debriefing questionnaire

Melvyn E. Kalich; Clarence E. Rash; Thomas H. Harding; Sion Jennings; Gregory Craig; Geoffrey W. Stuart

doi:10.1117/12.819500

1 May 2009 Flight performance using a hyperstereo helmet-mounted display: post-flight debriefing questionnaire

Melvyn E. Kalich, Clarence E. Rash, Thomas H. Harding, Sion Jennings, Gregory Craig, Geoffrey W. Stuart

Proceedings Volume 7326, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIV: Design and Applications; 732605 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.819500
Event: SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, 2009, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

Helmet-mounted display (HMD) designs have faced persistent head-supported mass and center of mass (CM) problems, especially HMD designs like night vision goggles (NVG) that utilize image intensification (I2) sensors mounted forward in front of the user's eyes. Relocating I2 sensors from the front to the sides of the helmet, at or below the transverse plane through the user's head CM, can resolve most of the CM problems. However, the resulting increase in the separation between the two I2 channels effectively increases the user's interpupillary distance (IPD). This HMD design is referred to as a hyperstero design and introduces the phenomenon of hyperstereopsis, a type of visual distortion where stereoscopic depth perception is exaggerated, particularly at distances under 200 feet (~60 meters). The presence of hyperstereopsis has been a concern regarding implementation of hyperstereo HMDs for rotary-wing aircraft. To address this concern, a flight study was conducted to assess the impact of hyperstereopsis on aircraft handling proficiency and pilot acceptance. Three rated aviators with differing levels of I2 and hyperstereo HMD experience conducted a series of flights that concentrated on low-level maneuvers over a two-week period. Initial and final flights were flown with a standard issue I2 device and a production hyperstereo design HMD. Interim flights were flown only with the hyperstereo HMD. Two aviators accumulated 8 hours of flight time with the hyperstereo HMD, while the third accumulated 6.9 hours. This paper presents data collected via written questionnaires completed by the aviators during the post-flight debriefings. These data are compared to questionnaire data from a previous flight investigation in which aviators in a copilot capacity, hands not on the flight controls, accumulated 8 flight hours of flight time using a hyperstereo HMD.

Citation Download Citation

Melvyn E. Kalich, Clarence E. Rash, Thomas H. Harding, Sion Jennings, Gregory Craig, and Geoffrey W. Stuart "Flight performance using a hyperstereo helmet-mounted display: post-flight debriefing questionnaire", Proc. SPIE 7326, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIV: Design and Applications, 732605 (1 May 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.819500

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available