25 March 2010 Particle generation during photoresist dissolution
Author Affiliations +
A lattice-type Monte Carlo based mesoscale model and simulation of the lithography process has been described previously [1]. The model includes the spin coating, post apply bake, exposure, post exposure bake and development steps. This simulation has been adapted to study the insoluble particle generation that arises from statistically improbable events. These events occur when there is a connected pathway of soluble material that envelops a volume of insoluble material due to fluctuations in the deprotection profile that occur during the post exposure bake [2]. Development erodes the insoluble material into the developer stream as an insoluble particle. This process may produce a cavity on the line edge that can be far larger than a single polymer molecule. The insoluble particles generated may coalesce in developer to form large aggregates of insoluble material that ultimately deposit on the wafer surface and the tooling. The recent modifications made in mesoscale models for the PEB and dissolution steps, which have enabled this study are briefly described. An algorithm that was used for particle detection in the current study is also discussed. The effect of the resist formulation and the different lithographic steps, namely, exposure, post exposure bake and development, on the extent of particle generation is analyzed. These simulations can be used to set process variables to minimize the extent of particle generation.
© (2010) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Siddharth Chauhan, Siddharth Chauhan, Mark Somervell, Mark Somervell, Michael Carcasi, Michael Carcasi, Steven Scheer, Steven Scheer, Roger T. Bonnecaze, Roger T. Bonnecaze, Chris Mack, Chris Mack, C. Grant Willson, C. Grant Willson, } "Particle generation during photoresist dissolution", Proc. SPIE 7639, Advances in Resist Materials and Processing Technology XXVII, 763933 (25 March 2010); doi: 10.1117/12.848424; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.848424


Back to Top