3 March 2010 Impact of scanner signatures on optical proximity correction
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Low pass filtering of mask diffraction orders, in the projection tools used in microelectronics industry, leads to a range of optical proximity effects, OPEs, impacting integrated circuit pattern images. These predictable OPEs can be corrected with various, model-based optical proximity correction methodologies, OPCs , the success of which strongly depends on the completeness of the imaging models they use. The image formation in scanners is driven by the illuminator settings and the projection lens NA, and modified by the scanner engineering impacts due to: 1) the illuminator signature, i.e. the distributions of illuminator field amplitude and phase, 2) the projection lens signatures representing projection lens aberration residue and the flare, and 3) the reticle and the wafer scan synchronization signatures. For 4x nm integrated circuits, these scanner impacts modify the critical dimensions of the pattern images at the level comparable to the required image tolerances. Therefore, to reach the required accuracy, the OPC models have to imbed the scanner illuminator, projection lens, and synchronization signatures. To study their effects on imaging, we set up imaging models without and with scanner signatures, and we used them to predict OPEs and to conduct the OPC of a poly gate level of 4x nm flash memory. This report presents analysis of the scanner signature impacts on OPEs and OPCs of critical patterns in the flash memory gate levels.
© (2010) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Jacek K. Tyminski, Jacek K. Tyminski, Tomoyuki Matsuyama, Tomoyuki Matsuyama, Yen-Liang Lu, Yen-Liang Lu, Jun-Cheng Lai, Jun-Cheng Lai, Kao-Tun Chen, Kao-Tun Chen, Yung-Ching Mai, Yung-Ching Mai, Irene Su, Irene Su, George Bailey, George Bailey, } "Impact of scanner signatures on optical proximity correction", Proc. SPIE 7640, Optical Microlithography XXIII, 76400V (3 March 2010); doi: 10.1117/12.845061; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.845061
PROCEEDINGS
11 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top