2 September 2010 A comparison of anamorphic, keystone, and Zernike surface types for aberration correction
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 7652, International Optical Design Conference 2010; 76520B (2010) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.871025
Event: International Optical Design Conference 2010, 2010, Jackson Hole, WY, United States
Abstract
Adding keystone distortion (in addition to anamorphism) to an off-axis asphere dramatically improves the ability of the surface to correct aberrations. Analogously, using 1-theta and 3-theta terms are important when using Zernike surfaces.
© (2010) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
John R. Rogers, John R. Rogers, } "A comparison of anamorphic, keystone, and Zernike surface types for aberration correction", Proc. SPIE 7652, International Optical Design Conference 2010, 76520B (2 September 2010); doi: 10.1117/12.871025; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.871025
PROCEEDINGS
8 PAGES


SHARE
RELATED CONTENT

Dennis Gabor’s catadioptric design and some new variations
Proceedings of SPIE (November 26 2017)
Diffractive null lens for parabolic mirrors
Proceedings of SPIE (September 08 2010)
The Principles Of Aberration-Corrected Optical Systems
Proceedings of SPIE (February 13 1986)
Simple Method For Designing Lenses
Proceedings of SPIE (September 15 1980)

Back to Top