You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
12 May 2010Structural effects and techniques in precision pointing and tracking systems: a tutorial overview
Structural dynamics is one of the most important elements of a precision gimbal design which often dominates the system line-ofsight
stabilization and pointing performance. Structural effects are manifested in these systems in several unrelated ways that the
systems engineer, and other members of the design team, must understand in order to insure a successful design. Once the effects are
clearly understood, analysis techniques, such as finite elements, can be applied to provide models to accurately predict the various
interactions and evaluate potential designs. Measurement techniques such as modal analysis can also be used to obtain models of
existing hardware and to verify the design. However, the successful and efficient application of the above process requires that the
underlying principles and effects are well understood by all the members of the engineering design team. This usually includes, as a
minimum, the control systems engineer, the structural analyst and the mechanical engineer but may involve other members of the
design team as well. Appropriate transfer functions for the various interactions, for example, can be defined and provided by the
structural analyst to the control system engineer to evaluate and performance predictions can be iterated as necessary until the entire
system meets the required performance in the intended dynamic environment. Often, however, one or more members of the team do
not have an appreciation for the effects or design process required and the result is a frustrated design effort and lower system
performance that might have otherwise been easily achieved. While different systems can have vastly different requirements and
configurations, the above effects and techniques are common to most and this paper is an attempt to provide a straightforward outline
of the more common of these in order to improve communication among design team members so that they can all contribute at their
maximum potential.
J. M. Hilkert andDavid L. Amil
"Structural effects and techniques in precision pointing and tracking systems: a tutorial overview", Proc. SPIE 7696, Automatic Target Recognition XX; Acquisition, Tracking, Pointing, and Laser Systems Technologies XXIV; and Optical Pattern Recognition XXI, 76961C (12 May 2010); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.849836
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
J. M. Hilkert, David L. Amil, "Structural effects and techniques in precision pointing and tracking systems: a tutorial overview," Proc. SPIE 7696, Automatic Target Recognition XX; Acquisition, Tracking, Pointing, and Laser Systems Technologies XXIV; and Optical Pattern Recognition XXI, 76961C (12 May 2010); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.849836