4 August 2010 The poacher turned gamekeeper, or getting the most out of the design review process
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
This paper presents an accumulation of knowledge from both sides of the design review table. Using experience gained over many reviews and post-mortems, some painful, some less painful; examining stakeholder's viewpoints and expectations; challenging aspects of accepted wisdom and posing awkward questions, the author brings out what he considers to be key criteria for a constructive design review. While this is not a guarantee to a successful outcome, it may nudge the balance from the reviews being an obligatory milestone (millstone?) towards them being a beneficial mechanism for project development.
© (2010) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Simon C. Craig, Simon C. Craig, } "The poacher turned gamekeeper, or getting the most out of the design review process", Proc. SPIE 7738, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy IV, 77380R (4 August 2010); doi: 10.1117/12.856525; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.856525
PROCEEDINGS
18 PAGES


SHARE
RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top