You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
8 April 2011Overlay progress in EUV lithography towards adoption for manufacturing
Extreme Ultra-Violet (EUV) lithography is a candidate for semiconductor manufacturing for the 16nm technology node
and beyond. Due to the very short wavelength of 13.5nm, EUV lithography provides the capability to continue single
exposure scaling with improved resolution and higher pattern fidelity compared to 193nm immersion lithography.
However, reducing the wavelength brings new equipment and process challenges. To enable EUV photon transmission
through the optical system, the entire optical path of an EUV exposure tool operates under vacuum, and in addition
reticle and optics are reflective. To obtain the required CD and overlay performance, both wafer and reticle front surfaces
need to have near-perfect flatness, as non-flatness directly contributes to focus and image placement errors, in the case of
the reticle due to non-telecentricity. Traditional vacuum chucks, both for reticle and wafer, cannot be used and are
replaced by electrostatic chucks. Any contribution of this new clamping method on CD and overlay control therefore
needs to be investigated, including avoidance of particle contamination over time. This work was performed on ASML's
EUV Alpha Demo Tool (ADT). We investigated the different, non-conventional contributions to overlay control on the
ADT, with particular attention to the wafer clamping performance of the exposure chuck. We demonstrate that we were
able to improve the overlay performance by compensating for the wafer clamping error during the wafer alignment
sequence. The impact of different wafer types on overlay was also evaluated. In addition to clamping effects, thermal
effects have also been shown to impact overlay and were evaluated by monitoring the thermal behavior of a wafer during
exposure on the ADT and correlating to the resulting overlay.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Jan V. Hermans, David Laidler, Charles Pigneret, Andre van Dijk, Oleg Voznyi, Mircea Dusa, Eric Hendrickx, "Overlay progress in EUV lithography towards adoption for manufacturing," Proc. SPIE 7969, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography II, 79691M (8 April 2011); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.881088