You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
The TTP (Targeting Task Performance) metric, developed at NVESD, is the current standard US Army model to predict
EO/IR Target Acquisition performance. This model however does not have a corresponding lab or field test to
empirically assess the performance of a camera system. The TOD (Triangle Orientation Discrimination) method,
developed at TNO in The Netherlands, provides such a measurement. In this study, we make a direct comparison
between TOD performance for a range of sensors and the extensive historical US observer performance database built to
develop and calibrate the TTP metric. The US perception data were collected doing an identification task by military
personnel on a standard 12 target, 12 aspect tactical vehicle image set that was processed through simulated sensors for
which the most fundamental sensor parameters such as blur, sampling, spatial and temporal noise were varied. In the
present study, we measured TOD sensor performance using exactly the same sensors processing a set of TOD triangle
test patterns. The study shows that good overall agreement is obtained when the ratio between target characteristic size
and TOD test pattern size at threshold equals 6.3. Note that this number is purely based on empirical data without any
intermediate modeling. The calibration of the TOD to the TTP is highly beneficial to the sensor modeling and testing
community for a variety of reasons. These include: i) a connection between requirement specification and acceptance
testing, and ii) a very efficient method to quickly validate or extend the TTP range prediction model to new systems and
tasks.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Piet Bijl, Joseph P. Reynolds, Wouter K. Vos, Maarten A. Hogervorst, Jonathan D. Fanning, "TOD to TTP calibration," Proc. SPIE 8014, Infrared Imaging Systems: Design, Analysis, Modeling, and Testing XXII, 80140L (9 May 2011); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.887219