1 October 2011 Operations dashboard: comparative study
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 8285, International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing (ICGIP 2011); 82853G (2011) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.914400
Event: 2011 International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing, 2011, Cairo, Egypt
In this present days and age, there are increasing needs for companies to monitor application and infrastructure health. Apart from having proactive measures to secure their application and infrastructure, many see monitoring dashboards as crucial investment in disaster preparedness. As companies struggle to find the best solution to cater for their needs and interest for monitoring their application and infrastructure's health, this paper summarizes the studies made on several known off-the-shelf operations dashboard and in-house developed dashboard. A few criteria of good dashboard are collected from previous studies carried out by several researchers and rank them according to importance and business needs. The finalized criteria that will be discussed in later sections are data visualization, performance indicator, dashboard personalization, audit capability and alert/ notification. Comparative studies between several popular dashboards were then carried out to determine whether they met these criteria that we derived from the first exercise. The findings hopefully can be used to educate and provide an overview of selecting the best IT application and infrastructure operations dashboard that suit business needs, thus become the main contribution of this paper.
© (2011) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Noor Nashriq Ramly, Noor Nashriq Ramly, Ahmad Zuhairi Ismail, Ahmad Zuhairi Ismail, Mohd Haris Aziz, Mohd Haris Aziz, Nurul Haszeli Ahmad, Nurul Haszeli Ahmad, } "Operations dashboard: comparative study", Proc. SPIE 8285, International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing (ICGIP 2011), 82853G (1 October 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.914400; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.914400

Back to Top