You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
23 February 2012Automated segmentation of tumors on bone scans using anatomy-specific thresholding
Gregory H. Chu,1 Pechin Lo,1 Hyun J. Kim,1 Peiyun Lu,1 Bharath Ramakrishna,1 David Gjertson,1 Cheryce Poon,1 Martin Auerbach,1 Jonathan Goldin,1 Matthew S. Brown1
Quantification of overall tumor area on bone scans may be a potential biomarker for treatment response assessment
and has, to date, not been investigated. Segmentation of bone metastases on bone scans is a fundamental
step for this response marker. In this paper, we propose a fully automated computerized method for the segmentation
of bone metastases on bone scans, taking into account characteristics of different anatomic regions. A scan
is first segmented into anatomic regions via an atlas-based segmentation procedure, which involves non-rigidly
registering a labeled atlas scan to the patient scan. Next, an intensity normalization method is applied to account
for varying levels of radiotracer dosing levels and scan timing. Lastly, lesions are segmented via anatomic regionspecific
intensity thresholding. Thresholds are chosen by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis
against manual contouring by board certified nuclear medicine physicians. A leave-one-out cross validation of
our method on a set of 39 bone scans with metastases marked by 2 board-certified nuclear medicine physicians
yielded a median sensitivity of 95.5%, and specificity of 93.9%. Our method was compared with a global intensity
thresholding method. The results show a comparable sensitivity and significantly improved overall specificity,
with a p-value of 0.0069.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Gregory H. Chu, Pechin Lo, Hyun J. Kim, Peiyun Lu, Bharath Ramakrishna, David Gjertson, Cheryce Poon, Martin Auerbach, Jonathan Goldin, Matthew S. Brown, "Automated segmentation of tumors on bone scans using anatomy-specific thresholding," Proc. SPIE 8315, Medical Imaging 2012: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 83150F (23 February 2012); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.911462