22 February 2013 Maximum imaging depth comparison in porcine vocal folds using 776-nm vs. 1552-nm excitation wavelengths
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Vocal fold scarring is one of the major causes of voice disorders and may arise from overuse or post-surgical wound healing. One promising treatment utilizes the injection of soft biomaterials aimed at restoring viscoelasticity of the outermost vibratory layer of the vocal fold, superficial lamina propria (SLP). However, the density of the tissue and the required injection pressure impair proper localization of the injected biomaterial in SLP. To enhance treatment effectiveness, we are investigating a technique to image and ablate sub-epithelial planar voids in vocal folds using ultrafast laser pulses to better localize the injected biomaterial. It is challenging to optimize the excitation wavelength to perform imaging and ablation at depths suitable for clinical use. Here, we compare maximum imaging depth using two photon autofluorescence and second harmonic generation with third-harmonic generation imaging modalities for healthy porcine vocal folds. We used a home-built inverted nonlinear scanning microscope together with a high repetition rate (2 MHz) ultrafast fiber laser (Raydiance Inc.). We acquired both two-photon autofluorescence and second harmonic generation signals using 776 nm wavelength and third harmonic generation signals using 1552 nm excitation wavelength. We observed that maximum imaging depth with 776 nm wavelength is significantly improved from 114 μm to 205 μm when third harmonic generation is employed using 1552 nm wavelength, without any observable damage in the tissue.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Murat Yildirim, Murat Yildirim, Onur Ferhanoglu, Onur Ferhanoglu, James B. Kobler, James B. Kobler, Steven M. Zeitels, Steven M. Zeitels, Adela Ben-Yakar, Adela Ben-Yakar, } "Maximum imaging depth comparison in porcine vocal folds using 776-nm vs. 1552-nm excitation wavelengths", Proc. SPIE 8588, Multiphoton Microscopy in the Biomedical Sciences XIII, 858825 (22 February 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2005630; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2005630
PROCEEDINGS
6 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top