14 March 2013 Picture perception and visual field
Author Affiliations +
Looking at a picture fills part of the visual field. In the case of straight photographs there is a notion of the “Field of View” of the camera at the time of exposure. Is there a corresponding notion for the perception of the picture? In most cases the part of the visual field (as measured in degrees) filled by the picture will be quite different from the field of view of the camera. The case of works of arts is even more complicated, there need not even exist a well defined central view point. With several examples we show that there is essentially no notion of a corresponding “field of view” in pictorial perception. This is even the case for drawings in conventional linear perspective. Apparently the “mental eye” of the viewer is often unrelated to the geometry of the camera (or perspective center used in drawing). Observers often substitute templates instead of attempting an analysis of perspective.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Andrea J. van Doorn, Andrea J. van Doorn, Huib de Ridder, Huib de Ridder, Jan Koenderink, Jan Koenderink, } "Picture perception and visual field", Proc. SPIE 8651, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVIII, 865119 (14 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2001609; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2001609


Anaglyph videoanimations from oblique stereoimages
Proceedings of SPIE (March 04 2015)
Case study The Avengers 3D cinematic techniques and...
Proceedings of SPIE (April 08 2013)
Development Of The Photographic Objective
Proceedings of SPIE (July 26 1985)
Human considerations in stereoscopic displays
Proceedings of SPIE (June 22 2001)
Virtual reality and the unfolding of higher dimensions
Proceedings of SPIE (January 30 2006)

Back to Top