Liver imaging: image quality evaluation and comparison between single and dual energy protocols

Yuan Yao; Alec J. Megibow; Norbert J. Pelc

doi:10.1117/12.2008363

19 March 2013 Liver imaging: image quality evaluation and comparison between single and dual energy protocols

Yuan Yao, Alec J. Megibow, Norbert J. Pelc

Proceedings Volume 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging; 86681V (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2008363
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2013, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando Area), Florida, United States

Abstract

Purpose: Some qualitative studies report a preference for blended dual-energy (DE) CT images over single energy (SE) images for liver CT imaging at the same dose. This is counter to theoretical expectations for simple tasks. We hypothesized that perhaps the broad spectrum of DE might be beneficial for a combination of tasks. We compare the CNR of SE and blended DE images for single and composite tasks, in part to see if they explain the preference. Methods: We simulated pre- and post-contrast SE abdominal CT imaging at various kVp but at constant average dose. Next, 80kVp and 140kVp scans with different dose allocations, dose matched to the SE images, were simulated. DE images were blended linearly with optimized blending ratios. The CNRs of liver against other soft tissues were used as a composite image quality metric for evaluation and comparison between the SE and DE protocols. In addition, the combination of the CNR of many tissue pairs pre- and post-contrast. Results: The CNR of pre-contrast single kVp imaging mostly increases with increasing tube voltage while 90kVp or lower energy yields higher CNR for post-contrast images, depending on the differential iodine concentration of each tissue. Similar trends are seen in the DE blended CNR curves. Results from the composite multi-CNR metric demonstrate that the SE protocol has better performance. Conclusions: Our study showed that an optimized SE protocol produces higher CNR, even for a range of tasks. This suggests that the reason for the radiologist preference must be something other than a fundamental advantage of DE.

Citation Download Citation

Yuan Yao, Alec J. Megibow, and Norbert J. Pelc " Liver imaging: image quality evaluation and comparison between single and dual energy protocols", Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 86681V (19 March 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2008363

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Liver

Tissues

Computed tomography

Image quality

X-ray computed tomography

Iodine

Composites

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years