Translator Disclaimer
19 March 2013 Liver imaging: image quality evaluation and comparison between single and dual energy protocols
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging; 86681V (2013)
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2013, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando Area), Florida, United States
Purpose: Some qualitative studies report a preference for blended dual-energy (DE) CT images over single energy (SE) images for liver CT imaging at the same dose. This is counter to theoretical expectations for simple tasks. We hypothesized that perhaps the broad spectrum of DE might be beneficial for a combination of tasks. We compare the CNR of SE and blended DE images for single and composite tasks, in part to see if they explain the preference. Methods: We simulated pre- and post-contrast SE abdominal CT imaging at various kVp but at constant average dose. Next, 80kVp and 140kVp scans with different dose allocations, dose matched to the SE images, were simulated. DE images were blended linearly with optimized blending ratios. The CNRs of liver against other soft tissues were used as a composite image quality metric for evaluation and comparison between the SE and DE protocols. In addition, the combination of the CNR of many tissue pairs pre- and post-contrast. Results: The CNR of pre-contrast single kVp imaging mostly increases with increasing tube voltage while 90kVp or lower energy yields higher CNR for post-contrast images, depending on the differential iodine concentration of each tissue. Similar trends are seen in the DE blended CNR curves. Results from the composite multi-CNR metric demonstrate that the SE protocol has better performance. Conclusions: Our study showed that an optimized SE protocol produces higher CNR, even for a range of tasks. This suggests that the reason for the radiologist preference must be something other than a fundamental advantage of DE.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Yuan Yao, Alec J. Megibow, and Norbert J. Pelc " Liver imaging: image quality evaluation and comparison between single and dual energy protocols", Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 86681V (19 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2008363;

Back to Top