Paper
19 March 2013 Task based assessment of a motion compensation algorithm via simulation of a moving stenotic vessel
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging; 86682B (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2006593
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2013, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando Area), Florida, United States
Abstract
An analysis of a task based simulation study of coronary artery imaging via computed tomography (CT). Evaluation of standard filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstruction and motion compensated reconstruction of a moving cylindrical vessel that contains a hyper-intense lesion. Multiple conditions are simulated including: varying rest times of the vessel and varying motion orientations. A reference image with no motion was used for all comparisons. The images were segmented and quantitative metrics for accurate segmentation were compared. The motion compensated images have consistent error metrics with respect to the static case for all rest times. The FBP reconstructions were visually inferior for shorter rest times and had significantly inferior metrics. This is the first demonstration of equivalent performance for a given task when the rest times are reduced well below the temporal aperture of the acquisition, using either advanced algorithms or different data acquisition such as multi-source geometries.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Brian E. Nett, Jed D. Pack, and Darin Okerlund "Task based assessment of a motion compensation algorithm via simulation of a moving stenotic vessel", Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 86682B (19 March 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2006593
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image segmentation

Computed tomography

Computer simulations

Visualization

Image quality

Reconstruction algorithms

Motion estimation

Back to Top