Paper
13 December 1976 A Critical Comparison Of Fast Transforms For Image Data Compression
Norman C. Griswold, Robert M. Haralick
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
There have been many investigations to determine achievable compression ratios for various transform encoding schemes. Often, results are not comparable because they are done with different images digitized to a different number of bits and sampled at different rates. In this paper a typical image for a remotely piloted vehicle application was selected and compared utilizing most of the popular transform methods. The comparison was made at average bit allocations of: 1 bit/pel, .75 bit/pel, and .5 bit/pel. The error criteria was a combination of visual, RMS, and RMS correlated error. The results indicated that the best performance was by the Fast Karhunen Loeve followed closely by the Discrete Cosine and Discrete Linear Basis. Those transforms classed as, "good performers", achieved a compression ratio of 12:1 or 1/2 bit per pixel. The auto correlation of the error images was computed and a characteristic decrease in correlation for lag 1 followed by an increase in correlation for lag 2 and lag 3 was observed. The Discrete Cosine Basis set was also compared with the eigenvectors of a first order Markov correlation matrix of dimension 16 and verified Ahmed's suggestion that the fit is good for even small dimensions.
© (1976) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Norman C. Griswold and Robert M. Haralick "A Critical Comparison Of Fast Transforms For Image Data Compression", Proc. SPIE 0087, Advances in Image Transmission Techniques, (13 December 1976); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.954994
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Transform theory

Image compression

Image transmission

Radon

Visualization

Image processing

Image segmentation

Back to Top