1 October 2013 How would photons describe natural phenomena based upon their physical experiences?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The question posed in the title represents an impossible approach to scientific investigation, but the approach is like a subjectivist. Obviously, photons cannot express their views; neither can we ask directly any scientific questions to the photons. The purpose is to draw the attention of the reader that even our strongly mathematically driven scientific enterprise is full of subjectivism when we start dissecting our thinking process. First, we frame questions in our mind to understand a natural phenomenon we have been observing. Let us not forget that framing the question determine the answer. The answers guide us to frame the foundational hypotheses to build a theory to “explain” the phenomenon under study. Our mind is a product of biological evolutionary requirements; which is further re-programmed by strong human social cultures. In other words, human constructed theories cannot spontaneously become rigorously objective, unless we consciously make them so. We need to develop a methodology of scientific thinking that will automatically force us to make repeated iterative corrections in generating questions as objectively as possible. Those questions will then guide us to re-construct the foundational hypotheses and re-frame the working theories. We are proposing that we add Interaction Process Mapping Epistemology (IPM-E) as a necessary extra thinking tool; which will complement the prevailing Measurable Data Modeling Epistemology (MDM-E). We believe that ongoing interaction processes in nature represent reality ontology. So the iterative application of IPM-E, along with MDM-E, will keep us along the route of ontological reality. We apply this prescription to reveal the universal property, Non-Interaction of Waves, which we have been neglecting for centuries. Using this property, we demonstrate that a large number of ad hoc hypotheses from Classical-, QM-, Relativity- and Astro-Physics can be easily modified to make physics more causal and understandable through common sense logics.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri, Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri, } "How would photons describe natural phenomena based upon their physical experiences?", Proc. SPIE 8832, The Nature of Light: What are Photons? V, 88320Z (1 October 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2025338; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2025338
PROCEEDINGS
12 PAGES


SHARE
RELATED CONTENT

Could space be considered as the inertial rest frame?
Proceedings of SPIE (September 09 2015)
If EM waves don't interfere, what causes interferograms?
Proceedings of SPIE (October 23 2012)
The history of noise
Proceedings of SPIE (May 24 2004)

Back to Top