How far can be SAR considered a tool for mountain hydrology?

Giacomo Bertoldi; Claudia Notarnicola; Stefano Della Chiesa; Georg Niedrist; Luca Pasolli; Ulrike Tappeiner

doi:10.1117/12.2031717

17 October 2013 How far can be SAR considered a tool for mountain hydrology?

Giacomo Bertoldi, Claudia Notarnicola, Stefano Della Chiesa, Georg Niedrist, Luca Pasolli, Ulrike Tappeiner

Proceedings Volume 8891, SAR Image Analysis, Modeling, and Techniques XIII; 88910G (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2031717
Event: SPIE Remote Sensing, 2013, Dresden, Germany

Abstract

Accurate information about soil moisture content (SMC) in mountain catchments is of great importance in hydrological applications, agriculture and climate change impact analysis. In the last two decades microwave remote sensing sensors such as Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) have been deeply exploited for surface SMC estimation. However, obtaining reliable predictions of fine-scale spatial and temporal patterns of SMC in mountain areas is still challenging due to the extreme variability in topography, soil and vegetation properties. In this contribution we analyze the spatial and temporal dynamic of surface SMC of alpine meadows and pastures with different techniques: (I) a network of fixed stations; (II) field campaigns with mobile ground sensors; (III) SMC retrieval from RADARSAT2 SAR images; (IV) simulations using the GEOtop 2.0 hydrological model. The strength and the weaknesses of the different estimation techniques are evaluated and the physical controls of the observed SMC patterns are analyzed. Results show that SAR SMC estimation corresponds well to the spatial ground surveys, but shows different patterns with respect to the model, especially for irrigated meadows. In fact, SAR patterns reflect vegetation, soil type and topography. Model output is in agreement with fixed stations observations, but it shows less spatial variability compared to SAR. Differences are likely due to the difficulties to know with sufficient spatial detail model parameters and irrigation amount. Therefore, results suggest that SAR products have a good ability to reproduce small-scale SMC patterns in mountain regions, thus complementing the ability of the hydrological model to predict temporal variations of SMC.

Citation Download Citation

Giacomo Bertoldi, Claudia Notarnicola, Stefano Della Chiesa, Georg Niedrist, Luca Pasolli, and Ulrike Tappeiner "How far can be SAR considered a tool for mountain hydrology?", Proc. SPIE 8891, SAR Image Analysis, Modeling, and Techniques XIII, 88910G (17 October 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2031717

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
13 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Synthetic aperture radar

Soil science

Vegetation

Sensors

Data modeling

Control systems

Remote sensing

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years