19 March 2014 Slit-scanning differential phase-contrast mammography: first experimental results
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The demands for a large field-of-view (FOV) and the stringent requirements for a stable acquisition geometry rank among the major obstacles for the translation of grating-based, differential phase-contrast techniques from the laboratory to clinical applications. While for state-of-the-art Full-Field-Digital Mammography (FFDM) FOVs of 24 cm x 30 cm are common practice, the specifications for mechanical stability are naturally derived from the detector pixel size which ranges between 50 and 100 μm. However, in grating-based, phasecontrast imaging, the relative placement of the gratings in the interferometer must be guaranteed to within micro-meter precision. In this work we report on first experimental results on a phase-contrast x-ray imaging system based on the Philips MicroDose L30 mammography unit. With the proposed approach we achieve a FOV of about 65 mm x 175 mm by the use of the slit-scanning technique. The demand for mechanical stability on a micrometer scale was relaxed by the specific interferometer design, i.e., a rigid, actuator-free mount of the phase-grating G1 with respect to the analyzer-grating G2 onto a common steel frame. The image acquisition and formation processes are described and first phase-contrast images of a test object are presented. A brief discussion of the shortcomings of the current approach is given, including the level of remaining image artifacts and the relatively inefficient usage of the total available x-ray source output.
© (2014) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Ewald Roessl, Ewald Roessl, Heiner Daerr, Heiner Daerr, Thomas Koehler, Thomas Koehler, Gerhard Martens, Gerhard Martens, Udo van Stevendaal, Udo van Stevendaal, } "Slit-scanning differential phase-contrast mammography: first experimental results", Proc. SPIE 9033, Medical Imaging 2014: Physics of Medical Imaging, 90330C (19 March 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2043631; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2043631
PROCEEDINGS
7 PAGES


SHARE
Back to Top