You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
21 March 2014Normal distributions transform in multi-modal image registration of optical coherence tomography and computed tomography datasets
In recent years, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has gained increasing attention not only as an imaging device, but also as a navigation system for surgical interventions. This approach demands to register intraoperative OCT to pre-operative computed tomography (CT) data. In this study, we evaluate algorithms for multi-modal image registration of OCT and CT data of a human temporal bone specimen. We focus on similarity measures that are common in this field, e.g., normalized mutual information, normalized cross correlation, and iterative closest point. We evaluate and compare their accuracies to the relatively new normal distribution transform (NDT), that is very common in simultaneous localization and mapping applications, but is not widely used in image registration. Matching is realized considering appropriate image pre-processing, the aforementioned similarity measures, and local optimization algorithms, as well as line search optimization. For evaluation purpose, the results of a point-based registration with fiducial landmarks are regarded as ground truth. First results indicate that state of the art similarity functions do not perform with the desired accuracy, when applied to unprocessed image data. In contrast, NDT seems to achieve higher registration accuracy.