Visual quality assessment of H.264/AVC compressed laparoscopic video

Asli E. Kumcu; Klaas Bombeke; Heng Chen; Ljubomir Jovanov; Ljiljana Platisa; Hiep Q. Luong; Jan Van Looy; Yves Van Nieuwenhove; Peter Schelkens; Wilfried Philips

doi:10.1117/12.2044336

13 November 2014 Visual quality assessment of H.264/AVC compressed laparoscopic video

Asli E. Kumcu, Klaas Bombeke, Heng Chen, Ljubomir Jovanov, Ljiljana Platisa, Hiep Q. Luong, Jan Van Looy, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Peter Schelkens, Wilfried Philips

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9037, Medical Imaging 2014: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 90370A (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2044336
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2014, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

The digital revolution has reached hospital operating rooms, giving rise to new opportunities such as tele-surgery and tele-collaboration. Applications such as minimally invasive and robotic surgery generate large video streams that demand gigabytes of storage and transmission capacity. While lossy data compression can offer large size reduction, high compression levels may significantly reduce image quality. In this study we assess the quality of compressed laparoscopic video using a subjective evaluation study and three objective measures. Test sequences were full High-Definition videos captures of four laparoscopic surgery procedures acquired on two camera types. Raw sequences were processed with H.264/AVC IPPP-CBR at four compression levels (19.5, 5.5, 2.8, and 1.8 Mbps). 16 non-experts and 9 laparoscopic surgeons evaluated the subjective quality and suitability for surgery (surgeons only) using Single Stimulus Continuous Quality Evaluation methodology. VQM, HDR-VDP-2, and PSNR objective measures were evaluated. The results suggest that laparoscopic video may be lossy compressed approximately 30 to 100 times (19.5 to 5.5 Mbps) without sacrificing perceived image quality, potentially enabling real-time streaming of surgical procedures even over wireless networks. Surgeons were sensitive to content but had large variances in quality scores, whereas non-experts judged all scenes similarly and over-estimated the quality of some sequences. There was high correlation between surgeons’ scores for quality and “suitability for surgery”. The objective measures had moderate to high correlation with subjective scores, especially when analyzed separately by camera type. Future studies should evaluate surgeons’ task performance to determine the clinical implications of conducting surgery with lossy compressed video.

Citation Download Citation

Asli E. Kumcu, Klaas Bombeke, Heng Chen, Ljubomir Jovanov, Ljiljana Platisa, Hiep Q. Luong, Jan Van Looy, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Peter Schelkens, and Wilfried Philips "Visual quality assessment of H.264/AVC compressed laparoscopic video", Proc. SPIE 9037, Medical Imaging 2014: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 90370A (13 November 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2044336

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available